Zoom Blog

Archive for October 2015

A review of Failure Lyric by Kristina Marie Darling has been published at Sabotage Reviews

 Hurray! A new review of Failure Lyric by Kristina Marie Darling has been published at Sabotage Reviews:

http://sabotagereviews.com/2015/10/09/failure-lyric-by-kristina-marie-darling/


___________________

Failure Lyric by Kristina Marie Darling

– Reviewed by Angelina D’Roza –

The first night I was iced out of the city […] At my feet, shattered glass. The finch’s broken neck. I just sat there, counting the dirty feathers, its cracked bones. The dead bird said nothing

(“Boston”)

In Failure Lyric, an affecting image is crystallized through Kristina Marie Darling’s direct language, all downright sharp edges. The broken bird, and the speaker, who can’t look away, could easily symbolise the death of a marriage, say something about numb inertia, isolation, the strange ways through which the end of a relationship alters your focus, throws perspective. But that would be a bit too easy. Failure Lyric works because it’s cumulative: images recur, stories are told, retold, told again, remembered and misremembered. Reality is destablised: what we thought we knew about what’s gone before is rewritten in the face of the present, forcing us to experience the loss of the past we thought we had. The dead bird image, though beautiful, would be almost clumsy if it weren’t so well woven into a whole that’s unravelling.

Read more »

Kit Robinson, Aaron Simon, Alan Bernheimer, and Patrick Marks. A great evening! Poets Aaron Simon & Kit Robinson Read from their New Books at The Green Arcade Introduced by Alan Bernheimer

 

Kit Robinson, Aaron Simon, Alan Bernheimer, and Patrick Marks. A great evening! 


Poets Aaron Simon & Kit Robinson Read from their New Books at The Green Arcade on Friday. They were introduced by Alan Bernheimer. Hurray! 

Read more »

The Last Place I Lived by K. Alma Peterson Now Available!

 One of the early poems in this book concludes: “My wild side would like to know.” If yours would too, read The Last Place I Lived. The collection abounds in wit and verbal play, yet the reward in reading comes from an intelligence lodged deep, directing the lines in sophisticated ways, the “afterimage // glassily repeated in the hawk’s beveled eye.” K. Alma Peterson knows what to leave out—an ability to inventively compress language is one of her gifts. In context, the lines “let me / cut you an armful” so clearly offer both the neighbor’s flowers as well as the neighbor’s tenderness. These poems inhabit dead trees, rabbits lurking inside of magic hats, and high clouds. Through the unexpected, they explore the human, sometimes isolated, sometimes searching or sharing, “losing more / trailed wisps of self in billows.” A “dust-to-dust anxiety” recurs throughout; death is even a way of connecting to family in the memorable poem “Collective Sense of Sleep.” The book’s themes never overtake their delight in language (“Murphy has a law and a bed in the wall”). The poetry seems to move forward at the request of sound, providing a sense of inevitability though this is clearly surprising as well as accomplished work.

—Julie Funderburk, author of The Door that Always Opens, LSU Press


In this deeply textured book, K. Alma Peterson’s playful, brilliant language counterpoints very serious matter—the blunt fissures of survival and pain, creating a tension and energy that drives these poems. They might feel like sleight of hand but are really transformative, like alchemy. She sums it up best herself: “…straddling the gap between tame/art and reckless science, they play dangerously//turning experimentation into evidence…” (Trains Derail in the Deepest Woods and We Take Positions We Cannot Defend.) It is stunning work, and it makes you want to sing.

— John Minczeski, author of A Letter to Serafin, University of Akron Press


K. Alma Peterson’s new collection, The Last Place I Lived, begins with Rilke’s words as epigraph: Go into yourself and see how deep the place is from which your life flows. Here are some of Peterson’s places: the circus, the body, in its flesh and as a work of art, the beach, a narrator in rehabilitation and in yoga class, inside the mind of the narrator where language spills, torques, makes the whole world unfamiliar—“a gardener’s heart lies bleeding,/her whip in petals. Pity, its own/nemesis…”, inside the persona of the state of Florida, inside “ Memory’s jagged coast”---all these places, and more. Suffering has happened…it echoes in images that come and go, some in surreal poems, some in poems where we readers may feel a bit more grounded. We keep checking these poems to make sure we are keeping communion with the spirit who created them. A life has happened…keeps happening, and the narrator in these vivid, surprising poems tells us, “The last place I lived, I mean/really lived, was a treehouse in a strangler/fig. An entire graveyard of them/yellowing and shedding//everything but light./ I held a lantern//for that purpose, to that end.” Yes, some extraordinary light in this collection, the poet holding the lantern with great authority to grant vision.

—Deborah Keenan, author of ten collections of poems, and, from tiger to prayer, a book of writing ideas.


K. Alma Peterson is a graduate of the Warren Wilson MFA Program for Writers. Her poems have been widely published in print and online journals. She is the author of Was There No Interlude When Light Sprawled the Fen, BlazeVOX Books, 2010. She lives in Minnesota and Florida. She also is occasionally given to bursts of experimentation with printmaking, painting and drawing.

Book Information:

· Paperback: 84 pages

· Binding: Perfect-Bound

· Publisher: BlazeVOX [books] 

· ISBN: 978-1-60964-197-9


$16


 
 
 
 

The Last Place I Lived by K. Alma Peterson Book Preview

Read more »

Kristina Marie Darling interviewed at The Critical Flame

 Gaudy and DarlingMolly Gaudry (L) and Kristina Marie Darling (R)



Molly Gaudry
 was shortlisted for the 2011 PEN/Joyce Osterweil for her first verse novel, We Take Me Apart, which was also finalist for the Asian American Literary Prize for Poetry. Richard Garcia wrote of her debut, “The ordinary becomes mythical…and simple lines or sentences ring with ominous music,” and Brian Evenson writes, “Gaudry’s Beckettian narrative sews bright bits to near-faint whispers, slowly swaddling us in quiet and darkness.” Its companion novel, Desire: A Haunting, will be released in December 2015 from Ampersand Books. Gaudry is a faculty member at the Yale Writers’ Conference and the Creative Director at The Lit Pub.

Kristina Marie Darling is the author of over twenty collections of poetry and hybrid prose. A poet, fiction writer, and critic whose writing has been called “singularly graceful and stunningly incisive explorations of poetic insight” (Zach Savich), her work has been reviewed in numerous literary magazines including The Iowa ReviewPloughshares, and Boston Review. Darling holds an MA in Philosophy and is currently a Presidential Fellow and Gender Institute Dissertation Fellow at SUNY-Buffalo for a PhD in English Literature.

Darling and Gaudry corresponded over the summer of 2015, discussing their current and forthcoming work, violence and literature, how an author’s identity can haunt their writing, collaboration with visual artists, and more.


Kristina Marie DarlingDesire: A Haunting is formally adventurous, offering readers white space, lyric fragments, and beautiful fractures. Tell me about your process. How did that spare, very poetic form emerge? Were form and narrative linked from the beginning?

 

Molly Gaudry: It took me over a year and a half, after the story was written, to find the form for Desire. Initially, it mimicked my first book, We Take Me Apart, in which the narrator’s lines break syntactically. Her daughter, the narrator of Desire, sounds like her in this way, but her lines don’t break on breaths—they break on long stretches of silence. And these silences, visible, draw attention to absence and ghostliness; they perform on my narrator’s behalf the sadness of not just herself but also her voice being erased from memory.

So now I’ll flip the question around and ask you about your process and what generated the idea for Women and Ghosts.

 

KMD: When I first started drafting Women and Ghosts, I was thinking a lot about the idea of textual violence and more specifically, the extent to which reading from a place of privilege can become an act of violence. As a young female writer, I can say this type of violence has certainly happened to some of my poems. An older male writer, much more established than myself, once blacked out my manuscript, wrote sexually explicit things on the work, and sent it to me in the mail. While this individual clearly doesn’t represent all older, established male writers, I do view this as instance of textual violence, especially because an imbalance of power was at play.

When drafting the memoir, I wanted to explore the ways that violence (textual and otherwise) can give rise to self-destructive impulses. In other words, how does erasure of one’s labor, one’s voice, and one’s intentions give rise to self-erasure? Can self-awareness and awareness of this cultural machinery help one reclaim one’s voice? I hope these concerns come through in the formal choices I’ve made. The book makes use of self-erasure and footnotes, as well as grayscale and erasures of Shakespeare’s tragedies (particularly Hamlet).  I’m intrigued by the idea that form and the visual appearance of a poem, essay, or story can be politically charged, perhaps just as meaningful as the text itself.

I’m also deeply invested in the idea of erasure as excavation, an effort to redirect the reader’s focus and prompt them to attend to something they wouldn’t ordinarily notice. I trust that the erasures prompt the reader to confront gendered violence and the erasure of women’s voices, as violence and erasure occur in some of the most canonical texts. To consider the myriad ways that literature shapes the cultural imagination. To spark a larger conversation about ethical reading practices.

 

MG: Did Jen Bervin’s Nets have any influence on Women and Ghosts? Or if not, what authors and books did?

 

KMD: I think my process was actually a lot like yours: that the story for Desire was finished, but you continued to search for a form, a vehicle for the story that would do justice to your ideas. I finished much of the text for Women and Ghosts, but it felt disconnected, as though it were merely a collection of separate essays. While at a residency in Wyoming, I showed my work to the wonderfully talented Phil Zimmerman, a book artist, who suggested that I use the visual presentation of the work, and various typographical treatments, to unify the disparate ideas in the collection. After my discussion with Phil, I had a breakthrough, and was able to revise the draft so that it felt more cohesive, more unified.

As I revised, I looked at many examples of texts that use the space of the page as a visual field. You’re absolutely right that Jen Bervin was hugely influential for me. Her work prompted me to consider the ways a text, and more specifically, an erasure, is haunted by its source materials. Every text is haunted by a deeply problematic and ethically fraught literary inheritance. Even more importantly, Bervin prompted me to think about what it means to haunt a text myself. As a woman inhabiting a predominately male literary cannon, am I uninvited guest, rustling through a dim corridor in my white dress?  What does it mean to haunt one’s own texts? Can different parts of the self or parts of consciousness exist in dialogue with each other in the same rhetorical space? As I considered these questions and many others, I also looked at Ronald Johnson’s Radi Os, Janet Holmes’ The Ms of My Kin, and of course, Yedda Morrison’s Darkness, all of which use the space of the page differently, allowing white space to signify absence and presence, violence and respite.

I’d love to hear more about the visually arresting presentation of your work in Desire. To what extent is writing always visual in nature, even when we don’t fully recognize it?

 

MG: I really love your question: “What does it mean to haunt one’s own texts?” This summer, suddenly and unexpectedly, I finished a close-to-final draft of the third book in the series, Fit Into Me, a lyric memoir about reading, writing, love, and sex. It wasn’t until I had a clearer understanding of the larger scale concerns of Fit that I realized just how much of myself I had put into Desire. Dog’s willful denial of the violence in her past is my own. Her silence—I think she keeps it for me. Her own broken vocal cords and William’s cut neck, the broken-necked flowers in We Take Me Apart that dog’s mother sews back together after a storm—these aren’t just gory details. Writing Fit, I came to better understand why I was so insistent on the achronology of Desire, why I fought so hard to have Parts One and Two follow chronologically but Part Three exist entirely in flashback. Desire ends in memory, picks up where We Take Me Apart leaves off. Desire ends in the unspeakable past. I guess it makes more sense to me, even now, why it took so long for me to find the right form for Desire. All that unvoiced pain, visible on the page and breaking, breaking, breaking.

What about your decision in Women and Ghosts to use grayscale as well as strike-through to create the erasures? Is it a double erasure? Or a move that makes the invisible actually more visible?

Read the Whole conversation here

Read more »
« 1 2 3

Extra Pages

Photos on flickr